<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Easy cross-browser compatibility with IE7.js</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/</link>
	<description>Advanced katas for javascripters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:10:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Jhonson</title>
		<link>http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Jhonson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/#comment-773</guid>
		<description>To rescue the web designers from this aching job of testing browser compatibility in different browsers there are few websites which offer this service. On these websites you can check the compatibility of your website in all desired browsers. You can find these websites at http://www.bestpsdtohtml.com/7-awesome-resources-to-test-cross-browser-compatibility-of-your-website/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To rescue the web designers from this aching job of testing browser compatibility in different browsers there are few websites which offer this service. On these websites you can check the compatibility of your website in all desired browsers. You can find these websites at <a href="http://www.bestpsdtohtml.com/7-awesome-resources-to-test-cross-browser-compatibility-of-your-website/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bestpsdtohtml.com/7-awesome-resources-to-test-cross-browser-compatibility-of-your-website/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Simard</title>
		<link>http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Simard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>@FrankLamontagne
You said exactly what I thought. Nothing more to say.

@Alex
No testing it in major browser is a really bad idea. But a simple site like this one is not then end of the world. There may be some glitches on IE, I don&#039;t know.

And while we&#039;re here, being a &lt;a href=&quot;http://alexdumas.net/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;real web designer&lt;/a&gt;, what do you think of the new design?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@FrankLamontagne<br />
You said exactly what I thought. Nothing more to say.</p>
<p>@Alex<br />
No testing it in major browser is a really bad idea. But a simple site like this one is not then end of the world. There may be some glitches on IE, I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>And while we&#8217;re here, being a <a href="http://alexdumas.net/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">real web designer</a>, what do you think of the new design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/#comment-400</guid>
		<description>The IE tag should be &quot;IE pissed me off&quot;. While IE is a pain in the ass, it&#039;s still the most used browser. 

And for putting project online without testing it the major browser, i don&#039;t realy think taht a good idea. Rushing something just to get it out faster ain&#039;t a good thing to do, it&#039;s like meeting a girl for the first time with a t-shirt witten &quot;I didn&#039;t wash myself everywhere&quot;. She might thinks it&#039;s funny, but then she might not (girls are like that, they&#039;re the IE of the sexes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IE tag should be &#8220;IE pissed me off&#8221;. While IE is a pain in the ass, it&#8217;s still the most used browser. </p>
<p>And for putting project online without testing it the major browser, i don&#8217;t realy think taht a good idea. Rushing something just to get it out faster ain&#8217;t a good thing to do, it&#8217;s like meeting a girl for the first time with a t-shirt witten &#8220;I didn&#8217;t wash myself everywhere&#8221;. She might thinks it&#8217;s funny, but then she might not (girls are like that, they&#8217;re the IE of the sexes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankLamontagne</title>
		<link>http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankLamontagne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/#comment-399</guid>
		<description>@Laurent,

I see this initiative more as a quick and temporary solution for people who want to put their own projects online even if they have not tested them on IE. Of course I wouldn&#039;t suggest to use these icons on your customer website! 

Knowing Dan personally I can tell you that -- while being &quot;a real project&quot; -- this initiative should not be taken too seriously. This being said, we all know that it&#039;s best when everything works on all browsers, but the universe isn&#039;t going to collapse if your newest side project isn&#039;t displaying perfectly in IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Laurent,</p>
<p>I see this initiative more as a quick and temporary solution for people who want to put their own projects online even if they have not tested them on IE. Of course I wouldn&#8217;t suggest to use these icons on your customer website! </p>
<p>Knowing Dan personally I can tell you that &#8212; while being &#8220;a real project&#8221; &#8212; this initiative should not be taken too seriously. This being said, we all know that it&#8217;s best when everything works on all browsers, but the universe isn&#8217;t going to collapse if your newest side project isn&#8217;t displaying perfectly in IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent</title>
		<link>http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>&quot;Not tested in IE&quot; and you want to make me believe your javascript knowledge ?

Tsss, even if this is a joke it is really a bad one. I hate to say it, but you HAVE to test (and fix) your work in IE if you want to be considered serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not tested in IE&#8221; and you want to make me believe your javascript knowledge ?</p>
<p>Tsss, even if this is a joke it is really a bad one. I hate to say it, but you HAVE to test (and fix) your work in IE if you want to be considered serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Simard</title>
		<link>http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Simard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>@Wayne
It&#039;s more a joke than anything else I think. The fact is that I don&#039;t have access to an IE browser at home and I don&#039;t want to install one just to test if my sites work on IE. I did that for everyone that is in the same position as me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wayne<br />
It&#8217;s more a joke than anything else I think. The fact is that I don&#8217;t have access to an IE browser at home and I don&#8217;t want to install one just to test if my sites work on IE. I did that for everyone that is in the same position as me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Pan</title>
		<link>http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Pan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t tell if you&#039;re serious about the &#039;Not tested in IE&#039; initiative. I&#039;m sorry but it&#039;s almost as bad as those &#039;Best Viewed in IE 5.5&#039; taglines of yesteryear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t tell if you&#8217;re serious about the &#8216;Not tested in IE&#8217; initiative. I&#8217;m sorry but it&#8217;s almost as bad as those &#8216;Best Viewed in IE 5.5&#8242; taglines of yesteryear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Simard</title>
		<link>http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Simard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/#comment-391</guid>
		<description>@macournoyer
I&#039;m sorry to disappoint you but IE7.js was not made by me :( 

If you&#039;re talking about the &quot;Not Tested in IE&quot; initiative, it was a lot easier than to continue to develop for IE. I did it because I&#039;m lazy I guess...

By the way, for the people interested in rails, take a look at macournoyer&#039;s server called &lt;a href=&quot;http://macournoyer.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/thin-a-fast-and-simple-web-server/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Thin&lt;/a&gt; : the most secure, stable, fast and extensible Ruby web server ever built!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@macournoyer<br />
I&#8217;m sorry to disappoint you but IE7.js was not made by me <img src='http://www.javascriptkata.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re talking about the &#8220;Not Tested in IE&#8221; initiative, it was a lot easier than to continue to develop for IE. I did it because I&#8217;m lazy I guess&#8230;</p>
<p>By the way, for the people interested in rails, take a look at macournoyer&#8217;s server called <a href="http://macournoyer.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/thin-a-fast-and-simple-web-server/" rel="nofollow"><br />
Thin</a> : the most secure, stable, fast and extensible Ruby web server ever built!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macournoyer</title>
		<link>http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>macournoyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javascriptkata.com/2008/01/08/easy-cross-browser-compatibility-with-ie7js/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Wow! that lib is awesome

Great initiative Dan!

You&#039;re starting more projects then I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! that lib is awesome</p>
<p>Great initiative Dan!</p>
<p>You&#8217;re starting more projects then I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
