Why should I de-anonymize?

For debugging. Instead of having a stack trace filled with ?() (representing an anonymous function), it is nicely printed and easier to follow.

For self-reference. Example, when you want an anonymous function to recall itself recursively, you would have to call arguments.callee. It’s odd and it’s deprecated anyway (people pointed to me that it’s not really deprecated but it throws an error in ECMAScript 5 strict).

Stack trace of anonymous functions…

If you run this in your firebug console (every javascripter should have firebug).

You get a stack trace that looks like this :
func()
func()
func()

… versus stack trace of named functions

You get a stack trace that looks like this :
f1()
f2()
f3()

As you can see, it’s a lot easier to debug and to understand who’s calling who.

Warning : There’s a bug in IE with named functions.

Recursive anonymous function

Let’s create a recursive anonymous function that counts to 10.

And let’s create it but using a named function.

Once again, the code is much clearer and it’s not using a deprecated element.

A note about closures to advanced javascripters

I just wanted to say that in the last example, you could have written this :

As you can see at line 4, I call the count function which is not the name of the function but the variable to which the function is assigned. It works, but it may not be the best thing to do. You can learn more about closure on that previous post and I’ll write more about it.

Annoucing redo in jskata.undo

I made a new version of jskata.undo still hosted on GitHub. If you look closer, it is now part of a library called jskata that is not officially announced. My next post will talk about it in details.

Demo

Take a look at the demo. The javascript of the demo is available here. You can see the complete doc on GitHub.

How does it work?

Execute an action that you can undo/redo

Doing something requires calling execute with 2 functions as parameters : the do and the undo.

Undo and redo the last action

Very easy!

Events and properties

For the moment, jskata.undo has just one event : onChange.

There are 2 properties : canUndo() and canRedo().

Stop looking! Here’s the answer.

You probably just forgot a comma (,) at the end of a hash. Here’s an example :

You see the extra comma at the string “Jeeves”? This what causes the problem. Firefox handles an extra comma nicely but Internet explorer doesn’t. To correct the error, just write :

JSLint to the rescue

Programmieraffe told me about JSLint. You paste your javascript code and it verifies it for you. Not only for extra-commas but everything else.

When I thought about undo before, I thought about a complicated Rails plugin that would keep an anonymous ID linking to any table in the database with an “action” field that would contain the action to undo. Pretty complicated stuff for something as simple.

The javascript solution

One day while I was writing some javascript, the solution struck me : I could handle this completely with javascript. The basic idea is that whenever an action is completed, I can save its undo function in an array and call it whenever I need it.

Example, if I’m saving a user in a database with Ajax :

1. I send the data to server to save a new user
2. The server returns the ID of the new user
3. I create a function with an ajax request that will send a delete of this user to the server
4. I add the previous function to a stack of undo functions to be able to call it later

That, when I call that last function, it will undo that user creation without having to keep it in memory server-side.

Introducing jsKata.undo

I wrote a little something called jsKata.undo on GitHub that contains the logic describe earlier. It’s quite simple but it may grow over time. It has no requirement, not even jQuery. It’s very simple to use.

The complete doc is on GitHub.

1. Adding an action that can you can undo

I’ll use the “add a user” example with jQuery.

2. Undo the last action you made

3. Events

Each time there’s a change, an onChange event is called. To assign yours, simply write :

There’s also an onEmpty event that is called when the stack of undoable actions is empty.

Complete demo

There is a complete demo on GitHub as well as the HTML and Javascript code for it. Take a look!

I want to talk about a different kind of calendar. The really hard one to write : calendars for displaying events in jquery.

The pretty jquery-week-calendar

Written by Rob Monie, this is the first one I tried. I was amazed about how easy it was to integrate with the current development of Timmy (you can see an early beta when you’re logged here). You can take a look at the demo. Unfortunately, I had unexplicable bugs and I didn’t take the time to understand them. Please, don’t do like me and participate to the code on GitHub.

• Looks good
• Easy to integrate
• May be buggy when drag-dropping/resizing

The robust fullcalendar

We switched to this calendar, written by Adam Shaw, because it had three different views (month, week, day) and because we had some problem with the other calendar. It doesn’t look as good as the week-calendar (demo). You can also participate on GitHub.

• The default look is OK
• Harder to work with
• Display may seem slow (on firefox)
• More robust than week-calendar

Finally

These guys have made a great job doing something really hard. Just think about two overlapping events or when an event is two minutes long or hundreds of special cases that could happen. Kudos to them for giving their time and talent to us.

A word about git

Our team (me and Frank, the RubyFleebie guy) worked with SVN for a couple of years until Git stole the spotlight. For a couple of months, we worked with it and enjoyed it. Until we had to do “more advanced” things (branching, merging which is pretty basic to my sense) and things got incredibly hard. We switched to Mercurial a couple weeks ago which feels more like the perfect mix between SVN and Git. So if, like us, you feel puzzled by Git, give Mercurial a chance.

Here’s the new solution using a private variable for the instance.

How to use it

Get the code on GitHub and see it live in action.

How does it work?

The magic lies in creating a different scope at the end of the class definition that does not include private variables. Then, private members are available in this scope and not outside of it, thanks to the power of closures.

Differences between private and public

These two classes definition shows the difference between the a class where all members are public versus a class where some members are private.

This is a class where all members are public.

This is the corresponding class where some members are private.

In the above code, line 15 makes all the difference between the two classes.

On GitHub

Get all the code on GitHub and see it live in action on my GitHub page.

First of all, you should never use an eval() when using JSON because of security reasons that I will talk about later in another post. [edit : jQuery uses eval() but there's a work-around that will be talked about in another post.]

JSON and jQuery

The simplest way to use JSON is though jQuery. I have been using for more than 2 years and I never was disappointed.

Let’s say I want to call Flickr search with JSON. It’s simple :

The $.getJSON takes 3 parameters.

1. The URL
The URL of the remote call.

2. The parameters
The parameters to complete the call. On the documentation page about this Flickr method, you have a list of all the parameters you can use. For a JSON call on Flickr, you have to send the api_key and the format. I added the parameter tags to send me all photos that are tagged landscape.

3. The callback
Most API services now requires a callback, a method that will be called when the JSON is loaded. It is more secure and easier to work with. At the end of the first parameter (the URL), I added jsoncallback=? (flickr called this parameter jsoncallback but it could be named differently on other services). This is the jQuery-way of saying “When you finish loading the JSON, call the method specificied by the third argument”.

You may wonder how Flickr knows which function to use on callback. It’s because in jQuery, there’s a special case for that. In the URL, you can see that the jsoncallback is written like that jsoncallback=?. The ? is replaced by your own callback method (in my case, I called it ajaxCallback)

The callback method

The callback method I used looks like this :

If you know jQuery a little, it simply creates the HTML to show the thumbnails and a link to the photo.

Get the code

You can get the complete code for this example on GitHub and a working example.

First, you loop with an index and assign the element to a variable.

You always have to have that extra assignment at the beginning of the loop.

Second, you loop with a for each.

In javascript, the for each loops though the index of the array instead of looping though the elements, like in most other languages. Thus, you also have to make the extra assignment at the beginning of the loop.

The easiest way of doing it is the third one.

How does it work? First it uses multi-assignment on one line. In javascript, you could write var i = 0, j = 1; and it would create two variables, i and j.

The second part of the for is confusing : it assigns the item but it never check if i it is out of bounds of the array (using i < items.length). It works because when javascript tries to assign an item after the end of the array (in our case items[3]), it returns null which is considered by javascript as false.

Your old buddy body.onload()

The safest way to execute javascript when a page loads is to use the body.onLoad method.

The document.ready function with jquery

This technique requires jquery and is similar to the body.onLoad technique (see above).

The problem is that I don’t like that the javascript code is too close to the HTML code. There’s really something that I don’t like.

The #ID.ready

DO NOT USE! It doesn’t work. At first, I tought that this technique worked but in fact, even if the element corresponding to the ID doesn’t exists, the function is called. To understand it better, I’ll give you an example. Suppose that I want to load a user list with ajax after the page load and that list correspond to ul#users, I’d write the following code

Unfortunately, it doesn’t work.

The document.ready + #ID.each

After the failure of the #ID.ready technique (see above), I tried a similar thing that is working but ugly looking. Suppose I want to do the same as above, I’d write this :

That way, it would execute the loadUsersWithAjax() method for each ul#users and because element IDs are unique to a page, the method would be called only once. It looks bad but it’s the “prettiest” way I found of executing javascript code on page load.

Now, I want to know what would you suggest? Which technique is your?